Editorial standards

GlobeBriefly publishes explanations and analysis with an emphasis on traceable sources, clear context and visible accountability.

Evidence and attribution

Material factual claims should be supported by identifiable sources. Primary documents, official data and original research are preferred where relevant. Quotations must preserve their meaning and identify their speaker and source. Links, image credits and source dates belong close to the material they support.

Reporting, analysis and calculations

Reporting, opinion, analysis and sponsored material must be distinguishable. A calculation or illustration must state its inputs and assumptions. A projection must not be presented as an observed result. Uncertainty and limitations should remain visible when they affect the conclusion.

Publication credits and AI assistance

A story may carry an identified author or the GlobeBriefly publication credit. A publication credit does not imply an unnamed team of experts. We do not claim credentials, interviews, first-hand testing or independent review that did not occur. Where AI materially assists an article, its production note should explain the role it played and identify the underlying sources.

Human review and sensitive subjects

AI-assisted drafting is not a substitute for accountable editorial judgment. Health, legal and financial material requires review appropriate to its potential consequences. Article-specific review or expertise is stated only when it can be substantiated.

Corrections and commercial relationships

Material corrections should state the error, the change and the date. Relevant paid relationships or conflicts should be disclosed alongside the affected content. See our corrections policy and advertising disclosures.

Contact the publication

Send an article URL, the disputed passage and supporting evidence to sekaprodot@gmail.com. See ownership and accountability for the operator information.