Iceland Votes No on EU Talks as Fishing Fears Decide Referendum

Why geopolitics did not decide Iceland’s EU vote

Foreign observers had assumed security would shape the vote. War is raging in Europe and neighbouring Greenland is coveted by Donald Trump, the American president whose ambassador in Reykjavik once joked that the two islands could become America’s 51st and 52nd states.

Most states able to secure themselves through alliances are doing exactly that. Sweden and Finland joined NATO shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine. Ukraine has applied to join both NATO and the EU, and Canada — another country Mr Trump imagines as a future American state — is trying to get closer to the bloc. Iceland, already a NATO member, might have seemed an obvious candidate for the EU as well.

Yet every referendum is fought on home ground, and domestic issues dominated the ballot.

Fish, farms and a rural-urban split drove the No

Iceland’s fishing industry, which accounts for almost 40% of the country’s goods exports, spearheaded opposition to EU membership. Fishing interests had derailed the previous plan to join the union in 2013, after the country suffered a crippling financial crisis. This time they made the same argument: EU rules would allow other countries’ vessels into Icelandic waters and impose catch caps that would hurt exports.

The campaign against joining was bolstered by a broader belief that Iceland can prosper on its own, and that existing arrangements with the EU — along with membership in NATO — are sufficient.

Fish were not the sole factor. Only inside Reykjavik, the capital, did most voters back restarting negotiations; everywhere else there was a clear majority against. Farmers fretted about competition and loss of government subsidies. Employers and some unions also stood against membership. That proved more convincing than the campaign in favour, which argued that a tiny island nation needs formal membership in a wider union to thrive.

Why Brussels will shrug — and why the rebuke still matters

Brussels will certainly minimise the rejection. Iceland has only 400,000 people — fewer than any current member, just 0.1% of the EU population. It is already in the European Economic Area, a sort of outer tier of the EU, and forms part of Schengen, the bloc’s passport-free travel scheme.

The referendum was also only to reopen negotiations suspended in 2013 after a change of government. The renewed talks might have failed anyway.

Still, that will offer limited comfort to a union proud of its magnetism for outsiders. Ten countries with a combined population of 150m have formally applied to join the union, though talks with Turkey, the largest, have been frozen for years. All are poor, most have dysfunctional politics and one — Ukraine — is at war.

This weekend’s vote is a reminder that richer potential members such as Switzerland and Norway are in no rush to join. Montenegro hopes to join as the bloc’s next member, but its path remains uncertain. Brussels likes to contrast Mr Trump’s threats of absorbing neighbours with the EU’s own attraction, which supposedly has adjacent states clamouring for entry. Somebody neglected to inform Iceland.

This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline “Cold shoulder” — From the September 5th 2026 edition.

Also in this section

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents.

Ukraine is racing desperately to counter Russia’s ballistic missiles

With Europe’s help, the country can limit the pounding but not eliminate it.

The Alternative for Germany has won its best-ever election result

But the hard-right could still fall short of forming a government in Saxony-Anhalt.

America has a whopping debt. But Europe has the whopping debt problem

The French-size problem at the heart of the EU.

Haakon VIII, Norway’s new king, has a big crown to fill

Tiny Montenegro still hopes it will be the EU’s next member

Ukraine is bracing for Russia’s hardest winter blitz yet

Report a correction